The internet pages
of the project
 
 
    Home

 
Home
About Coverage
Objectives
Partners
Publications
Demonstrations  
News
Links
Members Area
Contact
 
 
 
  Objectives

 
Data Link Control Layer DLC
Optimized Handover schemes with MIP (Mobile IP)
Link Adaptation
Single Frequency Networks
Flexible OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency division Multiplex) Testbed
 

 
 

Data Link Control Layer DLC

The main task of forwarding is, to handle the transmission of data packets from the AP to the EPs and from the EPs to the RMTs. Our investigations led to the so-called BEACON concept (Figure 1) in time domain for the multihop DLC, which is a suitable extension of the H/2 DLC. H/2 conform MTs expect every 2 ms the broadcast of a so-called BCH. The BCH contains general information like net ID etc. and a pointer, which marks the beginning of the FCH within the MAC frame. The FCH contains the information about the structure of the current MAC frame and is therefore different for each AP and/or EP. The BEACON concept relies on the H/2 option for sector antennas, where different sectors get their own BCHs and FCHs – which are serially transmitted by the AP. In contrast to a single AP, where the AP transmits the BCHs/FCHs for all sectors, here the EPs synchronize first to the BCH of the AP and transmit afterwards serially their own BCHs/FCHs. This avoids collisions on the air interface, while each RMT sees a regular BCH from an EP or the AP.

Every second frame the AP/EPs transmit crosswise empty frames. For this purpose the MAC scheduler at the AP/EP has to know additionally that it is an AP/EP, i.e. a slightly modified scheduler is needed for the AP and EPs. The MTs/RMTs need no modification.

Figure 1: Schematic DLC-protocol for BEACON concept

Figure 2 shows a general challenge for forwarding. As forwarding requires at least two orthogonal resources in time, frequency or code - to transmit data packets in a first step from AP to EP and in second step from EP to RMT – the gain in throughput and/or distance by EPs in a LOS scenario is very small.

Figure 2: Maximum End2End User Throughput vs. Distance for Forwarding under LOS Conditions

Under the assumptions described above the achievable throughput decreases very rapidly with the number of EPs. In Figure 3 a star arrangement of EPs – i.e. all EPs are located around the AP – is investigated under different PHY mode selections for the first hop between AP and EP and the second hop between EP and RMT. As can be seen already for 7 EPs throughput breaks down completely and no user data can be transmitted at all. The simulations in Figure 3 have been done for the so-called SF-FSA-concept (Subframe Fixed Slot Allocation). The BEACON concept performs only slightly better. In the meantime we have proposed and analyze techniques to decrease the protocol overhead.

Figure 3: End2End throughput for multihop networks with SF-FSA DLC-protocol

 

 

 
  Last Modification: 2002-02-10   Content   Webmaster